County Clerks Warned About ‘Void and Unenforceable’ Marriage Licenses
Jan 3, 2020
On January 2, the Constitutional Government Defense Fund, a division of Alliance for Law and Liberty, sent a letter to County Technical Advisory Service, County Officials Association in Tennessee, and all 95 county clerks in Tennessee advising them that the marriage licenses they are issuing to two people of the same sex are “void and unenforceable” under provisions of Tennessee’s Constitution that the federal court did not enjoin.
The letter corresponds to and complements a de facto “lawsuit” CGDF filed on December 19, 2019, with the Tennessee Department of Health on behalf of hundreds of ministers in Tennessee over a same-sex type Certificate of Marriage that Department is issuing.
The letter and the “lawsuit” note that, after the Supreme Court’s marriage decision in Obergefell v. Hodges, the federal court having jurisdiction over the marriage lawsuit filed against then-Governor Haslam did not enjoin enforcement of this provision in Tennessee’s Constitution: “Any policy or law or judicial interpretation, purporting to define marriage as anything other than the historical institution and legal contract between one man and one woman, is contrary to the public policy of this state and shall be void and unenforceable in Tennessee.”
The letter to the county clerks acknowledges that they “are issuing licenses for marital contracts [between same-sex couples] in reliance on Attorney General’s advice,” but encloses for them the pleading filed by Attorney General Herbert Slatery that shows the federal court’s decision not to enjoin this provision was “at the urging of the Attorney General & Reporter.”
Letter to the TN County Clerks
Enclosure 1: Petition of Declaratory Order, Tn Dept. of Health
Enclosure 2: Tanco v. Haslam Final Order
Enclosure 3: AG’s Reply to Plaintiffs Proposed Order
Enclosure 4: CTAS Memo Replying to the AG
Enclosure 5: AG Opinion 84-157
The letter corresponds to and complements a de facto “lawsuit” CGDF filed on December 19, 2019, with the Tennessee Department of Health on behalf of hundreds of ministers in Tennessee over a same-sex type Certificate of Marriage that Department is issuing.
The letter and the “lawsuit” note that, after the Supreme Court’s marriage decision in Obergefell v. Hodges, the federal court having jurisdiction over the marriage lawsuit filed against then-Governor Haslam did not enjoin enforcement of this provision in Tennessee’s Constitution: “Any policy or law or judicial interpretation, purporting to define marriage as anything other than the historical institution and legal contract between one man and one woman, is contrary to the public policy of this state and shall be void and unenforceable in Tennessee.”
The letter to the county clerks acknowledges that they “are issuing licenses for marital contracts [between same-sex couples] in reliance on Attorney General’s advice,” but encloses for them the pleading filed by Attorney General Herbert Slatery that shows the federal court’s decision not to enjoin this provision was “at the urging of the Attorney General & Reporter.”
For Further Reading
Letter to the TN County Clerks
Enclosure 1: Petition of Declaratory Order, Tn Dept. of Health
Enclosure 2: Tanco v. Haslam Final Order
Enclosure 3: AG’s Reply to Plaintiffs Proposed Order
Enclosure 4: CTAS Memo Replying to the AG
Enclosure 5: AG Opinion 84-157